Search for: "Mays v. Social Security Administration" Results 501 - 520 of 2,252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 11:15 am
After the birth, the mother applied to the Social Security Administration for survivor benefits. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:02 pm by Alan B. Morrison
There is, however, another problem at the Social Security Administration: supposed variability among ALJs. [read post]
According to this provision, the facts disclosed in a data breach notification under Art. 33 of the GDPR may not be used in proceedings for administrative fines without the consent of the organization concerned. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 12:02 pm by Michael Lowe
It can include forging checks, taking someone else’s retirement or Social Security benefits, or using a person’s credit cards and bank accounts without their permission. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Prompt action to identify and self-correct covered violations may mitigate the penalties a company faces under Code Section 6039D as well as other potential liabilities associated with those violations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), the Social Security Act, or other federal laws. [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:00 am
ONONDAGA COUNTYFamily Law Social Security Administration, Medi-Cal Finding Of Husband's Disability Not Binding on Court Matter of E.L. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  And in considering those claims, the fact that the companies are for-profit enterprises, or corporations, may well be relevant, whether or not they are determinative threshold considerations. 5. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
North Carolina, which asks whether a ban on social media use by sex offenders violates the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Furthermore, that process fails as a means of providing effective or legitimate legal review of administrative action. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:44 am
Retirement Board’s failure to make an independent evaluation of an individual’s application for disability retirement fatal to the processSchlesinger v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 2010 NY Slip Op 20123, Decided on April 7, 2010, Supreme Court, Kings County, Judge Martin SchneierIn this Article 78 action Michael Schlesinger asked the court to annul, the action of the [New York City Employees’ Retirement System] denying his application for a disability… [read post]