Search for: "Miner v Miner" Results 501 - 520 of 2,329
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 489 This issue in this appeal was whether the local planning authority, properly understood the meaning of the word “openness” in the national planning policies applying to mineral working in the Green Belt, as expressed in the National Planning Policy Framework. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal will consider whether North Yorkshire County Council misapplied paragraph 90 of the National Planning Policy Framework when considering mineral extraction in the Green Belt. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 5:05 am by Charles Sartain
Co-authors Paul Yale and Rusty Tucker The concurrence and dissent in Briggs et al v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am by Charles Sartain
Co-authors Paul Yale and Rusty Tucker Herein, highlights from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Briggs, et al. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal is considering whether the Appellant council misapplied paragraph 90 of the National Planning Policy Framework when considering mineral extraction in the Green Belt. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 12:04 pm by Sasha Volokh
Can surface rights owners control the rights of those who own the mineral rights underneath? [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:13 am by Charles Sartain
” There was a 15-year mineral reservation and a general warranty clause. [read post]