Search for: "Needles v. Needles"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2014, 5:22 pm
Smith v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Circuit’s opinion in Verizon v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:21 pm
" That seems to say that they can seize a haystack so long as they intend to look for needles. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:11 pm
In NC Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:36 pm
Festo Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 11:54 am
Millipore v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 11:13 am
For instance, the FTC cites 1975’s Goldfarb v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 3:12 am
In Weathers v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
’” Id. at *8 (quoting Unites States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 6:04 am
The way the Court reaches this conclusion may require some threading of a needle…” I [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 11:22 pm
The case is American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:55 pm
The test (commercialized by Sequonom) is hugely popular because it does not involve sticking a needle through the placenta and the resulting significant likelihood of miscarriage. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 7:35 am
On appeal, though, in Padilla v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:39 pm
We argue in our brief that the active-state-supervision requirement applies to a professional-licensing board comprising self-interested members of the regulated profession based on the “independent centers of decisionmaking” analysis from American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm
The simple and straightforward decision is Scanlon v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
"He also commented that in Interflora 1 (Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 [noted by the IPKat here] Lewison L.J. had stated that different considerations from the general position on surveys apply where the issue is whether a registered mark has acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 9:55 pm
July 15, 2014 - "Alice v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:28 pm
CLS Bank: How Far Has the Needle Moved? [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:40 am
The Justices were also unanimous in an important antitrust decision from OT09, American Needle v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:26 pm
The Court has opened a door here—one that the Court in Employment Division v. [read post]
