Search for: "Nelson v. Powers"
Results 501 - 520
of 573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2010, 11:16 am
Nelson, 512 F.3d 1134 (9th Cir. 2008). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:58 am
Nelson, the Ninth Circuit case I blogged about here and here. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Simply put, the public interest standard is not really a “standard” at all since it has no fixed meaning; the definition of the phrase has shifted with the political winds to suit the whims of those in power at any given time. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 11:20 am
Which reminds me that the twentieth anniversary of the first all-female Ninth Circuit panel is coming up next year -- a panel that Judge Fletcher was also on, even those many years ago (alongside Judge Dorothy Nelson and Judge Judy Keep, the latter sitting by designation).So let's test your predictive powers. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:32 pm
“We showed that we built this program with our own ideas, our own technology, our own person power. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm
There is a powerful formalist case for getting rid of the filibuster. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 7:53 am
Nelson (1969) 1 Cal. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:43 pm
Nelson. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The banks gain immense political power over a thirty-year bull market, as they become part of our cultural elite. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:30 am
Michael Nelson. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 2:05 am
It had existed in English and then American law for centuries, not as some kind of peculiar power [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 7:36 am
Salazar v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 11:51 pm
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:57 am
Here is the abstract: What we call "judicial review" was not established in Marbury v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 4:25 pm
(The procedural vs. substantive dichotomy traces, of course, to the Supreme Court’s interpretation of its 1938 ruling in Erie Railroad v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:53 pm
Monday in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:58 pm
The Supreme Court of Montana ruled 6-1 in Kulstad v. [read post]
