Search for: "No Respondents Named" Results 501 - 520 of 30,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2013, 3:08 pm by Howard Wasserman
This included six times in which Scalia quoted either from the lower-court decision or from Justice Stevens' dissent and went out of his way to replace Harris' name with [respondent]. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Brushy responded that “there [did] not seem to be grounds for [Fischer’s] request,” and that Brushy would “review” Fischer’s concerns if he was more “specific. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:35 am by Nadia Kayyali
Our demands, which we ask Facebook to respond to by October 31, are: Commit to allowing pseudonyms and non-legal names on its site in appropriate circumstances, including but not limited to situations where using an every day name would put a user in danger, or situations where local law requires the ability to use pseudonyms. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
In addition, dealers could respond to higher-order-processing costs due to increased margins by widening bid-ask spreads, which would reduce the attractiveness of the CDS market for end-users. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 1:34 am by Gmlevine
The answer lies in Respondent’s motive for choosing the domain name. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 7:49 am
  Respondent registered the disputed domain name "nutrisystems.com", merely adding an "s" to Complainant's marks and domain name. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 2:29 pm
Recently, in response to a question about contractual risk management posted on LinkedIn, someone responded with a rant about how lawyers screw businesses up and the legal system deprives folks of their rights, ending with an admonishment to avoid lawyers and courts altogether by â€" get this â€" never using a contract. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:26 am by Ryan McKeen
My name is Rhonda Stearley-Hebert, manager of communications for the Judicial Branch. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:48 am by admin
(i) The Disputed Domain Name is identical or is confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name; (iii) The Disputed Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:44 pm by Sandy Levinson
  To be sure, he will find it ever harder to name anyone to office, but is that a source of real "hope" about resolving our problems. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:21 am by gmlevine
According to the Respondent “the president of Complainant’s Southern Star Chapter in Tampa, Florida knew about and encouraged Respondent’s acquisition of the domain name. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 4:53 am
An attorney was automatically disbarred by operation of a felony conviction by the New York Appellate Division for the First Judicial Department: The Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order...striking respondent's name from the roll of attorneys as of the date... [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 11:53 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Gail Heriot in In the Name of Hate: Examining the Federal Government's Role in Responding to Hate Crimes, a Report of the U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 7:59 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Gail Heriot in In the Name of Hate: Examining the Federal Government's Role in Responding to Hate Crimes, a Report of the U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 8:33 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Gail Heriot in In the Name of Hate: Examining the Federal Government's Role in Responding to Hate Crimes, a Report of the U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 10:37 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Gail Heriot in In the Name of Hate: Examining the Federal Government's Role in Responding to Hate Crimes, a Report of the U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:16 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Disciplinary Review Board told the story From April 2007 through December 2015, respondent was an associate and then a named partner at the firm... [read post]