Search for: "Norris v. Norris"
Results 501 - 520
of 557
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2008, 11:16 am
Norris v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:48 pm
Norris v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 2:04 am
Sherman in his Texas State & Local Tax Law Blog Using accordions as a law firm marketing technique - Legal marketing expert Larry Bodine in his Law Marketing Blog ERISA attorney blogger comments on Tullis v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 11:41 pm
Thames at Archer Norris. [read post]
28 May 2008, 12:46 pm
As noted in an article by Floyd Norris of the New York Times, a panel of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled in Jones v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:11 pm
Witt v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 9:47 am
Alabama (1932) established that the Constitution guarantees indigent capital defendants a right to effective appointed counsel, while Norris v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 4:23 pm
They are basically using the same argument under which a right to privacy was found under Roe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
V. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 7:21 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there were other aggravating features such as… [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
Norris v USA: judgment in full "He described the obstruction charge as "subsidiary" to the price-fixing charge that the law lords ruled was not an extraditable offence. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
R (On The Application of Animal Defenders International) V Secretary of State For Culture, Media and Sport (Respondent) [2008] UKHL 15 (12 March 2008) Norris (Appellant) v Judgments - Government of the United States of America and others (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from Her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 16 (12 March 2008) Brit Syndicates Limited for and on behalf of Brit Syndicate 2987 at Lloyd’s for the 2003 year of account and others… [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 4:12 am
Most of the media attention, if the judgments get any attention on budget day, will be on Norris v United States, the extradition case in [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:06 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:57 am
Norris v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Opinion below (Court of Appeals of Texas) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of the Edison Electric Institute (in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-653 Case name: Norris v. [read post]
