Search for: "PEOPLE v. Garcia"
Results 501 - 520
of 549
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2008, 3:28 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 8:35 pm
I read a lot of cases. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Garcia-Ruiz, No. 07-51269 Conviction for reentry into the U.S. as a deported alien is affirmed over an objection that police lacked reasonable suspicion to stop and detain defendant, where defendant had mooted the issue by stipulating to facts establishing all the elements of the charged crime. .. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Garcia-Alvarez, No. 071471, 071697 Conviction for carjacking and firearms offenses is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence proffered against defendant was not sufficient; and 2) the district court erred in denying defendant's motion for a new trial. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 6:12 am
The[y] never actually carried out their plan, however, because they were not able to acquire cocaine.U.S. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:50 pm
The Court revisited the issue last year in Panetti v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:19 am
See Elektra v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 5:22 pm
In The Adoption of unborn child B.W.; Wilfrido Garcia v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 7:28 pm
Some came to us having perceived these as the desperate actions of desperate people. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 9:32 am
Millan and last week, Garcia v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:27 am
Zelon.Split in DistrictDespite conceding that Manchel's argument held such "considerable appeal" that another division in the district had recently accepted it in People v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:56 pm
California Appellate Districts, May 05, 2008 People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Supreme Court, April 23, 2008 Virginia v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Baze v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Garcia, No. 07-40245 A conviction for drug-related offenses is reversed and remanded for a new trial where: 1) during rebuttal closing argument, the government improperly bolstered its key witnesses, the agents who heard defendant's unrecorded confession; and 2) such bolstering constituted reversible plain error, which seriously affected the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of the proceedings. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:16 pm
The letter read in part: "Because you were a witness in the case of the People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 7:38 am
(citing People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 9:35 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
" U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, February 05, 2008 Garcia-Meza v. [read post]
