Search for: "POWELL v. UNITED STATES" Results 501 - 520 of 836
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2012, 6:10 am by Marissa Miller
United States, a Brady case in which a former Merrill Lynch executive is seeking review of his conviction for perjury and obstruction of justice in connection with his testimony before the Enron grand jury. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 12:46 pm by The Federalist Society
United States raises several cutting edge questions about federal preemption of state laws. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:40 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Wickham, 382 U.S. 111, 116 (1965); whether the rule is subject to a kind of reliance that would lend a special hardship to the consequences of overruling and add inequity to the cost of repudiation, e. g., United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:08 am by Christopher Sagers
  If the Court takes the case, it would likely clarify the “foreseeability” test for clear articulation first formulated by Justice Powell—something of a foe of antitrust enforcement—in Town of Hallie v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:53 am by Susan Brenner
§ 1030(a)(2) is “a fine . . . or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both,” if the offense “was committed in furtherance of any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States”. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Ryan M. Rodenberg
Carlisle, P.A.Serona Elton: Assistant Professor of Music Business & Entertainment Industries, University of MiamiDennis Curran: Senior Vice President & General Counsel, National Football LeagueStephen Starks: Legal Affairs Director, United States Anti-Doping AgencyScott Shapiro: Praver Shapiro Sports Management, FounderMike Santos: Assistant General Manager, Florida PanthersTony Agnone: Owner, Eastern Athletic ServicesJan Paulsson: Professor, University of Miami School of… [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am by George M. Wallace
In the majority opinion by Justice Powell, Mathews v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am by George M. Wallace
In the majority opinion by Justice Powell, Mathews v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am by George M. Wallace
In the majority opinion by Justice Powell, Mathews v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:07 pm by Sam Eichner
On January 10, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
A certain kind of original-intent theory was self-defeating, if Powell's historical analysis was correct. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Here is what Justice Ginsburg wrote: Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm by paperstreet
Powell] have received from [Home Depot] for the right to use his patented invention in the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
No. 40145/98)]; residents of a slum that was engulfed by a methane explosion from a neighbouring tip [Oneryildiz v Turkey (2004) 41 EHRR 20l]; and a local authority moving an elderly resident between care homes [Watts v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR 66]. [read post]