Search for: "Parcel Direct"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,065
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2015, 10:02 pm
Finally, “not necessarily contiguous” replaced “one general location” because farms might be separated by a road or a parcel of land owned by someone else. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
The husband had transferred certain parcels of realty. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
The appellate court upheld the lower court’s ruling that found the State Lands Commission (“SLC”) violated CEQA when it approved a land exchange with the City of San Francisco involving a waterfront parcel of land near the S.F. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:36 pm
Furthermore, reliance by the trial court on EPTL § 10-6.2(a)(4) was error as this section refers to the "Exercise of a power of appointment; conformity to directions of donor", and is inapplicable to the case here. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:35 am
One look at the dozen or so EU Directives on the subject shows how muddled things become when the two approaches are combined with a view to 'harmonising' copyright law. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:26 pm
United Parcel Service, leaving employers to wonder how that guidance applies to their workplace and their employees. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am
European approach in InfoSoc directive: introduce a concept of “no independenteconomic significance. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 5:43 am
It reminds us of the highest piece of sports wisdom we have ever heard, football coach Bill Parcells’s pronounc [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:38 am
This Kat sees two possible future directions. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:53 am
As a result, larger business will exert greater control over the smaller employer who actually owns and operates the business … fewer employers will parcel out business to local subcontractors, suppliers, or subsidiaries for fear that they will now be liable for the subcontractor’s employment decisions. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:08 pm
On June 25, 2015, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) updated its Enforcement Guidance: Pregnancy Discrimination and Related Issues to make it consistent with the decision in Young v.United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:29 am
A number of harmonizing directives followed. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 8:07 pm
“The NLRB ruling is a sharp departure from previous decisions that stated companies were only responsible for employees who were under their direct control. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 4:45 am
The situation in all three places is the direct result of Russia’s armed intervention. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 10:10 pm
The entire parcel was zoned commercial and represented the last large undeveloped parcel in a major growth area. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 3:21 pm
The parties apparently intended that plaintiff would pay defendant 55% of the net appraised value of both parcels and, in consideration for that payment and plaintiff's assumption of responsibility for the outstanding liabilities concerning the parcels, defendant would assign his interest in the parcels to plaintiff, giving plaintiff sole ownership of both parcels. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 10:21 am
The parties apparently intended that plaintiff would pay defendant 55% of the net appraised value of both parcels and, in consideration for that payment and plaintiff’s assumption of responsibility for the outstanding liabilities concerning the parcels, defendant would assign his interest in the parcels to plaintiff, giving plaintiff sole ownership of both parcels. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:48 pm
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on or about April 17, 2008, which determined the market value of two properties and directed closings thereon, dismissed, without costs. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:48 am
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on or about April 17, 2008, which determined the market value of two properties and directed closings thereon, dismissed, without costs. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:48 am
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on or about April 17, 2008, which determined the market value of two properties and directed closings thereon, dismissed, without costs. [read post]