Search for: "Parcell v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2011, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
United States, (CD CA, filed 1/10/11) (full text of complaint), the VFW asks the court to quiet title to the parcel of land, to issue a declaratory judgment that the VFW is the owner of the land and to issue an injunction requiring the Secretary of Interior to consummate the land transfer. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am by John Mikhail
  Anticipating the theory later made famous by Justice Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Brad Kuhn
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
  No lay witnesses exist to testify as to whether a defendant's act of putting these parcels in the mail or on an airplane constituted an intentional and clandestine conspiratorial effort to get the charged, legal merchandise into the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:49 am by Joy Waltemath
A memo sent by a union to its bargaining unit members, which named two firefighters who had sued the union and the county for retaliation and stated that union members would likely have to pay more in dues to defend against these “frivolous” claims, was not speech on a matter of public concern, an Eleventh Circuit panel ruled in rejecting the union’s claim that the First Amendment immunized its speech. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:07 am by Andrew Delaney
United States, involving another do-gooder, this time in Burlington, Vermont, trying to convert an old railbed to a recreational trail. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm by Administrator
  Finally, after the statute was upheld by the Minnesota Supreme Court, Jacobs Engineering filed a writ of certiorari to the United State’s Supreme Court which asked the high court to review the 2008 legislation and its applicability to construction work completed in 1967 (Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., v. [read post]