Search for: "Patch v. Patch" Results 501 - 520 of 996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  As Justice Roberts reminded us last week in Riley v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am by Liskow & Lewis
See National Environmental Development Association’s Clean Air Project v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am by Carlos Moreno
See National Environmental Development Association’s Clean Air Project v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am by Katherine McCoy
See National Environmental Development Association’s Clean Air Project v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:05 am by Eric Goldman
The premiere issue features a Symposium on the Target breach, FTC v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:11 am by Jack Goldsmith
This means that patching the vulnerabilities we find won’t make it appreciably harder for criminals to find the next one. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:59 am by Jack Goldsmith
We have discussed the manifold challenges of zero day vulnerabilities quite a lot on this blog – why they are central to the cybersecurity challenge, how their discovery is vital to both offensive and defensive postures in cybersecurity, optimal USG policy on stockpiling v. publishing and patching vulnerabilities, and the like. [read post]
2 May 2014, 11:35 am
We knew what the correct result ought to be in Brown v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:41 pm by Orly Lobel
In two early decisions, Fortnightly Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm by Jack Goldsmith
Can the vulnerability be patched or otherwise mitigated? [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Unlike patches and gums, e-cigarettes have advantage of recapitulating social glamor of smoking; sucking, primordial human urge. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:36 pm
            The decision in Yates v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
And while we’re discussing the Chinese, Lauren analyzed some of the issues at play in Ralls Corp. v. [read post]