Search for: "People v A. M."
Results 501 - 520
of 12,413
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2015, 4:18 pm
You can charge older people more for goods and services than young people because the former have more money than the latter.So holds the Court of Appeal.I'm sure that the fancy-schmancy "luxury health" fitness club in the Bay Area here decided to charge 18 to 29 year-olds a (much) lower monthly fee than its older patrons because they were concerned that single people in their 20s in the Bay Area had much lower disposable income than their regular… [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:16 pm
Collins’ companions took the keys out of the ignition of the semi-truck so defendant could not drive off again, because defendant had said something like, 'I’m out of here,' and had gotten back into the cab of the truck. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 12:46 pm
Maybe they're marginally relevant; and, to be clear, I'm saying "maybe" just to be safe. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:53 pm
Yeah, I'm familiar with the concept. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:30 am
I’m just glad she’s not pregnant like her mother. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 3:15 pm
"A toughie for sure.Honestly, I'm glad I wasn't responsible for deciding this one. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:02 am
"I'm a good person. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:51 pm
And I have serious concerns that, at least in some cases (though by no means in most of them), that decision might even result in people innocent of an offense being convicted. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:21 pm
Restraining orders are legal orders that protect a person or multiple people from another person. [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 8:03 am
I know that it's been commonly stated that KM means different things to different people and if you pressed me for an answer I guess I'd say that KM ultimately means getting the right information to the right people at the right time. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:19 am
Facebook’s tagging feature creates a “face signature” hash value of people’s faces. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 1:30 pm
I'm pretty confident where this one has to go at this point. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:58 pm
Even though what the judge told the jurors was totally correct as a matter of law, the process employed here seems troubling to me.Something that I'm sure will hear more about -- in another decade or so -- when the federal habeas proceedings reach the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:39 am
That seems wrong on both ends; I'd have been happier if the co-conspirators had to spend more time in prison and this guy slightly less.I say all this, by the way, even though I'm extremely -- and some might say overly -- concerned about the ease of kidnapping. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 4:38 pm
I'm impressed. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:14 am
That said, I'm certainly not going to say it's unreasonable given California precedent. [read post]
26 May 2007, 8:03 am
Schumm v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 3:16 am
Levy in UMG v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
July 20, 2011 at 2011 WL 2892118, is the first California case that I'm aware of dealing with a class arbitration waiver in the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
