Search for: "People v Irish"
Results 501 - 520
of 598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 pm
Nahum (IP Law Blog) District Court S D New York: Amazon isn’t liable for rogue affiliate’s keyword ad buys: Sellify v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 8:16 am
The recent judgments in Kay v United Kingdom (ECHR, 21 September 2010) and Manchester City Council v Pinnock (UK Supreme Court, 3 November 2010), and the implications which they have for Irish housing authorities under the ECHR Act 2003 will be discussed in detail. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:54 am
., Yurman Design, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
Article 3 of Protocol 1 requires that states hold “free elections at reasonable intervals by secret ballot, under conditions which will ensure the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature” (emphasis added). [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:00 pm
As was reiterated earlier this year in Lynch v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform, preventative justice “has no place in our legal system” (People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm
The case of Z v United Kingdom (2001) 34 ECHR 97 illustrates this well. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:45 am
Nevertheless, the Irish Government continues to show considerable reticence in amending the law to bring it into line with European jurisprudence. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:39 am
Finally he accuses the Court with some justification of relying on inappropriate precedents, including Dahlab v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:50 pm
IP Holdings v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
Finally, Lauren V. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:41 pm
In terms of police shooting, 22 people have been fatally wounded by the New Zealand police in the past 70 years. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:59 am
R (Limbuela) v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
In 1936, the Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:00 pm
Furthermore, what impact will it have on cases taken by victims of people who are granted prohibition in sexual cases? [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:52 am
However, the Circuit Court decision in People (DPP) v Kelly is relevant. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:45 am
This marked a major elevation in terms of their legal effect in India, in part influenced by the 1951 Indian Supreme Court decision in Madras v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
Should Ireland have responsibilities to people rendered on planes that have entered Irish airspace, would the Irish government fulfil its legal (not necessarily its moral) obligations through the acceptance of such assurances? [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 4:05 am
Price v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:28 am
But some judgments are genuinely important for many people; for example the recent ruling in Tchenguiz & Ors v Imerman – relating to the use of stolen evidence in court - which could impact anyone involved in divorce proceedings. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:14 am
We thought it was kind of funny, but people who work in that office are not laughing. [read post]
