Search for: "People v Jacobs" Results 501 - 520 of 697
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 11:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
To what extent is this value created by the public v. the person. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 4:05 am by Alfred Brophy
 A year earlier, Jacob Broches Aronoff wrote in the St. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am by Clara Altman
 The New Republic also has a  review of Norman Davies, Vanished Kingdoms: The Rise and Fall of States and Nations (Viking), which Jacob Soll describes as a "colossal wreck of a book. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm by Pace Law School Library
Land seizures in the People’s Republic of China: protecting property while encouraging economic development. 22 Pac. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:56 am
As Jacob LJ has pointed out in Aerotel, [2006] EWCA Civ 1371 [32], “[p]atents are essentially about information as to what to make or do. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
In a separate libel claim, the football agent Paolo Vernazza and his ex-wife Sapphira, are suing the People newspaper over a story about Cole and her former husband, Ashley Cole, in a defamation and privacy claim. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:53 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 Jacob Grier also has a comment worth quoting: In the past I’ve defended the Koch brothers from charges that their political activities are motivated by narrow self-interest. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Bexis
Deposition2007-02-20 Nix v GSK, 2007 WL 7079369 (Serevent) Deposition2007-02-09 Jacob v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm by Liz Campbell
Surveillance is of critical importance in the investigation of serious and organised crime, in determining the extent and patterns of criminal behaviour, and in the gathering of evidence to construct a case against a suspect; thus it has been described as one of the most important legal weapons deployed by the United States against Mafia groups and families (see Jacobs, Busting the Mob: United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
In Huras v Primerica Financial Services Limited[13]an agreement on settlement was reached which provided small compensation to each member of the large group of class members.[14]  The settlement provided for additional compensation to be paid to the Ontario and British Columbia RPs – $3000 and $2000 respectively.[15]  By way of contract, in Sutherland, Justice Winkler disallowed a claim where the RP sought compensation for work related to the administration of the… [read post]