Search for: "People v Legall"
Results 501 - 520
of 31,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:37 am
John’s Law Review will be hosting a symposium on West Virginia v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
In this vein, the recent Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) decision in Gitxaala Nation v Canada was heralded as a major legal victory for Indigenous peoples opposing the opposing the Enbridge pipelines and tankers proposal, and many hope that we are now on a pathway to put that risky project to rest for good. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 4:25 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:03 am
As Bushnell v. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 8:20 pm
Truong v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:00 am
v=DlIXcqnVM50 Can you mention famous people in your book, play or movie? [read post]
11 May 2008, 4:32 pm
Blogger's note: Loving v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:16 am
Ancestry Court Casts Doubt on the Legality of the Data Brokerage Industry–Brooks v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:49 pm
Either legally or factually. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:31 am
At the Law Deans on Legal Education Blog, Richard Gershon (Mississippi) compares SEALS and AALS as conferences, identifying the pros and cons of each. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
In Lawrence v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:25 am
We the People is a franchise that provides forms and help in legal matters including wills, trusts, divorces, bankruptcy and other areas of law. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:00 pm
, James v. [read post]
2 Jun 2025, 9:01 pm
Here we need to get into some inside baseball in the legal field (about which I teach and write) known as Remedies. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Equally, the European Court of Human Rights considers that the principles set out in the preamble to the Convention refers to the Convention as a whole (see, inter alia , ECHR rulings Engel and Others v. the Netherlands on June 8, 1976, Klass and Others v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
If the prosecution (or the trial court, on its own initiative or pursuant to a letter request from the DOC) can permissibly ask the trial court to increase a sentence (or conviction) because it's legally impermissible, can't defendants do the exact same? [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 12:28 pm
Regardless, what's the legal distinction? [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
" This, by the way, was better (or at least more favorable to the prosecution) than the defendant's previous offer, which was to confess to various unsolved crimes in return for "a segregated cell with a television, $200 in his inmate trust account, a double bacon cheeseburger, strawberry milkshake, and chili pork burrito, stamped envelopes, legal pads, pencils, media contacts, and an exclusive interview. [read post]
