Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
This reluctance has been captured by an admonition credited to Lord Denning about the importance of a judge not conducting the examination of witnesses because “he, so to speak, descends into the arena and is liable to have his vision clouded by the dust of conflict …” (Lord Denning was quoting Lord Greene MR, in Yuill v Yuill [1945] P 15, 20.) [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 2:51 am
The case of Burki v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:45 am
Lord Chief Justice Camden in Entick v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 12:34 am
I make a point of a point raised by Lord Justice Ward in G (A Child) [above], in this post, here on Family Lore. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
Why hesitate, people may ask. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
Why hesitate, people may ask. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lady Black and Lord Sales. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:36 am
The case was referred to the ECJ by the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) in 2008 (M, R (on the application of) v Her Majesty’s Treasury [2008] UKHL 26). [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:36 am
In the decision of the House of Lords in Airedale v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
In particular, she submitted that the House of Lords upheld the Court of Appeal’s decision in relation to the grant of an injunction without express consideration of proportionality. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This largely came down to whether or not the current protesters prevented other people protesting in PSG. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This largely came down to whether or not the current protesters prevented other people protesting in PSG. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:11 pm
Around 20,000 people watch each month. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:09 am
”) Lord Kerr, like Stephens J at first instance, noted that that was not an immutable requirement as the ECtHR had stated in Mocanu v Romania (10865/09) (2015) 60 EHRR 19 (Paras 107-108 of Lord Kerr’s judgment) and as the Supreme Court had found in McCaughey’s case (See paras 118, 119 and, in particular, 139 of McCaughey’s case). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
He said that his hand were tied as The scope of the Convention jurisdiction within the meaning of Article 1 has been addressed by the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Bankovic, and by the House of Lords and the Supreme Court respectively in Al-Skeini and Smith v Oxfordshire. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:17 am
We had a post on this at the time and it appears to have led to Lord Justice Leveson’s warning to the press at the outset of his Inquiry. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
These attacks included a Daily Mail front page which described three high court judges as “enemies of the people. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 2:43 am
In Abdullah Ahmadi v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd Rothman J ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff US$7,500 damages in respect of an allegation that he was a people smuggler. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
If that were true, the prosecution of E could send the wrong message to other young people being similarly exploited. [read post]
