Search for: "People v Murray" Results 501 - 520 of 580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
For example, in the case involving a photograph of J K Rowling’s child taken in the street, Patten J said “if the law is such as to give every adult or child a legitimate expectation of not being photographed without consent on any occasion on which they are not, so to speak, on public business then it will have created a right for most people to the protection of their image” (see Murray v Big Pictures [2007] EWHC 1908 (Ch), [65]). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
This is an objective question, which should be formulated, according to Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481) at [35] as follows: “The question is what a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities would feel if she was placed in the same position as the claimant and faced with the same publicity” (Campbell v MGN at [99]). [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:07 pm by Fazal Khan
My response was that of course, people with ill-intent could interpret some epigenetic research findings as a “rational basis” to discriminate against groups or individuals that have a certain epigenetic profile. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 2:59 am by SHG
One of those rules, established by the Supreme Court nearly 50 years ago in a case called Brady v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am by Fiona de Londras
This past week we’ve seen the difficulties associated with using private companies and making these companies accountable come into sharp relief in the United States with the latest installation in the case of Mohammed et al v Jeppesen Dataplan. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 5:05 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Last Friday, the Supreme Court rendered another opinion dealing with a criminal case in People v Roberto Dupree. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:00 am by Adam Wagner
” 21 July | Frans Cornelis Adrianus VAN ANRAAT v the Netherlands (European Court of Human Rights) A man was prosecuted for supplying thiodiglycol (mustard gas) to Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:00 am by Michael Scutt
Andy Murray gave Wimbledon his best shot but was found wanting. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:27 pm by carie
Reprieve immediately requested the decision be reversed, citing the US Supreme Court’s ongoing consideration of a related case, Kiyemba v Obama (Kiyemba II), in which it was decided that US courts could not prevent the Obama Administration from forcibly repatriating prisoners to countries where they face persecution. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
Baroness Hale and others of course rejected such a notion obiter in Campbell and the High Court in the JK Rowling (Murray v Express Newspapers) case struck out JK Rowling’s claim on behalf of her young son after she was photographed in the street in Edinburgh, pushing him in his pram. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:07 am by Elie Mystal
Bill Murray’s Dad in Scrooged wasn’t this harsh. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:02 am by INFORRM
In Howlett v Holding, an injunction was granted to restrain “aerial harassment” surveillance of the claimant. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
In government and academia, she has shown a special capacity to bring together people with deeply held, conflicting views. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:40 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Respect the rights of people involved in the news. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm by Michael Fox
  The bill was introduced by Senator Menendez (D - NJ) and at this point has only three co-sponsors, Senators Gillibrand (D-NY), Murray (D-Wash), and Harkin (D-Iowa). [read post]