Search for: "People v Nails" Results 501 - 520 of 556
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2009, 2:06 pm
Wainwright (the 1963 decision requiring that poor people be represented by counsel when charged with serious crimes) and Mapp v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
  The testimony was excluded not on the basis of People v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 3:45 am
In fact, Pfeifer nails the real problem in his last paragraph: The majority has attempted to attribute rationality to the General Assembly’s unintentional act. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:59 am
And it doesn’t really matter, because we think like lawyers and people think like people, and it’s not the same thing any more. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:54 am
A friendly “on your left” can go a long way towards avoiding bike v. pedestrian collisions. 9. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:14 pm
  The consequence of this mathematics means that the purveyor of the tuna does not have warn consumers that the tuna violates Prop 65.The state didn't like that outcome and filed suit against the purveyor, in a case entitled People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 11:08 am
One such precedent-setting matter was Bell Atlantic Corporation v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 5:16 am
However, the execution of an innocent man isthe ultimative catastrophe in a civilized country and society since itcan happen to any of us.The cases of Troy Davis in Georgia and Jeff Wood in Texas shown so farwhat is possible when people stand up, and we're watching the developmentof these cases intently from Europe. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 7:14 am
  Krause relies on a 5th Circuit decision, U.S. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:12 am
  In that post, I was critical of the fellow officer who watched and enabled the officer who performed the "Big Shove," noting that one animal doesn't get away without the help of the rest of the pack.Now it's time to make note of how this "Big Shove" video reveals fundamental flaws in the criminal justice system.From The Smoking Gun comes the criminal court complaint in the case of People v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:21 am
  No one. of course, plans to arrest people as they type happily away on their keyboards, but should the indictment against Lori Drew stand, the government will have the ability to do so should someone be disturbed by the product of people's computer.Lori Drew's lawyer, Dean Steward, has moved to dismiss the indictment, per the Wall Street Journal Law Blog and the Washington Post. [read post]