Search for: "People v Rodriguez"
Results 501 - 520
of 612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2010, 10:26 am
Rodriguez (1973). [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
The question in this case is whether this rule applies only to first assistants under the default rule, or whether it also applies to the alternative people the president can designate. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 8:41 am
” * Rodriguez v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The “conspiracy” part of “seditious conspiracy” can apply to a whole bunch of people. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:34 am
In fact, the conservative majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:16 pm
Holder, Fedorenko v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:29 pm
The defendant supports his position on the rulings made in Kent v United States and People v Drummond. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm
Take for example Epic Systems v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 11:28 am
University May Be Liable for Improper Access to Student’s Facebook Photos – Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 10:30 am
It made the richest people in the world central — almost too central — figures in our lives. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 9:31 am
In People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Supreme Court case of Brady v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm
feature=player_embedded&v=wyx6JDQCslE&oref=http%3A%2F%2Fs.ytimg.com%2Fyt%2Fswfbin%2Fwatch_as3-vfl3J-I2Q.swf&has_verified=1COUNTY COURTTop rated as Exceptionally Qualified: Judge Steve Leifman - 54%Judge Andrea Wolfson - 52%Judge Charlie Johnson - 49%Judge Sam Slom - 47% Lowest Percentage of Unqualified votes: Judge Luise Krieger Martin - 5.10%Judge Leifman - 5.35%Judge Slom - 5.41%Judge Johnson - 5.60%Judge Shelly Kravitz - 5.67% Highest Percentage of… [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 8:34 am
This should be confusing to most people. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 9:31 am
In People v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:19 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
The case is Rodriguez v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 8:10 am
In Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
