Search for: "People v Word"
Results 501 - 520
of 17,902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2012, 9:55 am
In State v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:51 pm
In Appendix B to his opinion for the Court today in Brown v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:52 am
I had some words with a buddy at work. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:10 am
Whether Word, PPT, or an Excel worksheet in Windows, as soon as you open the document to edit it use this keyboard shortcut sequence: Control key (CTRL) and then click A, C, N, V. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 11:24 am
"In an ideal world, this would run its course, the people who have done something wrong would be punished, and the firm would take steps to change the environment. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 8:32 am
I'm reading "Maker of Dove Soap Will Drop the Word ‘Normal’ From Beauty Products/Unilever.... said a study had found that the word 'normal' makes most people feel excluded" (NYT). [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 7:07 pm
In Floyd-Tunnell v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:16 am
Following yesterday's Supreme Court opinion in Maryland v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:49 pm
In People v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Resorts World at Sentosa Pte Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 10:21 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am
Love v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:41 am
There are any number of things that one would assume people don’t have to be told, and here is an example: Curse words have no place in the courtroom. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 5:51 am
Different people will read the same words in an insurance policy and believe the words say different things. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:51 am
Likewise the sense has not shifted since King Alfred's day: 'to comprehend, grasp the idea of, receive from a word or words or from a sign the idea it is intended to convey; to view in a certain way.' But what does 'standing beneath' have to do with any of that?... [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
King v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:35 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 12:08 pm
In other words, it's the most clever people who are best at dressing up their emotional and partisan beliefs in high-minded reasoning, the best at cherry-picking the evidence to support their cause, the best at poking holes in any contrary evidence. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm
The Case of Navarette v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:25 pm
" Scalia broke in with "Some people don't read dissents. [read post]
