Search for: "People v. Barnes" Results 501 - 520 of 569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) Open access for University College of London research product (1709 Copyright Blog) Research by Bournemouth University and FremantleMedia ‘The exploitation of television formats: intellectual property and non-law based strategies (1709 Copyright Blog) Virgin Media, Universal Music team up to offer UK unlimited music (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP Osgoode) SCRIPT establishes IP Foresight Forum to discuss IP and media law and policy development (IPKat) United… [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:00 am
– Pay attention to what your distributors/dealers are doing in China (China Hearsay)  BSA: Software piracy rate down to 80% in China (S&F) Microsoft teams with City of Hangzhou to fight piracy (S&F)   Denmark Maritime and Commercial Court upholds Jetmobile’s IP rights in software case (International Law Office)   Europe L’Oreal v eBay: European courts rule eBay not liable for sales of counterfeit goods (IP Osgoode)… [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:01 am
None of the other false allegations were designed to get back at people. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 7:52 am
Does the Supreme Court favor businesses, or the people who sue businesses? [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
"During the passage of the Representation of the People Act 2000, which enlarged the franchise to include remand prisoners and psychiatric inpatients (RPA 2000 ss2 and 4), Labour's Harry Barnes suggested that in seeking to "enfranchise people who are dependent on decisions made by elected representatives" (HC Hansard 15 December 1999 Col 293-4) consideration should be given to extending voting rights to all prisoners. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 1:30 pm
In the latest chapter of a complex procedural route through the courts, in Barnes-Wallace v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]