Search for: "People v. Chambers"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,867
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2010, 2:07 pm
Now, under the case of McCormick v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 2:14 pm
With the justices slated to consider in the fall a Mississippi abortion law intended to challenge Roe v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 1:17 am
But it has now been given a reprieve as a result of seeking to intervene in another case, Scoppola v Italy (No. 3) (available in French, English press release here), which is going to the court’s Grand Chamber This is another prisoner voting case. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
Despite the healthy egos of those involved, when something becomes "personal," people occasionally get riled up. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 4:32 pm
In Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 2:56 am
[Alessandro’s Katpost on Lidl v Tesco here] The relevance of comparative advertising law has increased. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:33 am
If the makers of Ganesh v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 8:30 am
Marshall v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 6:29 am
In LG v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 8:58 am
Perhaps it's the chambers that resembled what a remodeled Greyhound Bus Assistant Manager's office looked like in 1979. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Chamber of Commerce et al v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 11:24 am
In the case on appeal, Rosenbach v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Boyd School of Law, UNLV) on "Moral Panic: How We See Other People's Kids as Criminals. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 1:29 am
The ‘other technique’ of cable retransmission is apparently irrelevant.The CJEU decided in this case without the opinion of the Advocate-General in a small chamber, so maybe it is a slip. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:45 am
So Long, Secretary Perez: DOL Head’s Goodbye Message — via Wage & Hour Insights Ochoa v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) at [15]. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:07 pm
It is at least strongly arguable that 24(3)(b) is limited in its reference to s.22(1)(2) and (4) - the sections that deal with disposal of premises to disabled people, i.e. entering an enforceable contract. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
This was confirmed in the case of Douglas & ors v Hello! [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
”Camus’s argument that the more people know about capital punishment the less they support it entered American jurisprudence in Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
