Search for: "People v. Friedman"
Results 501 - 520
of 617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
If you read the blog or know us personally, you know that we strive to be the "if you can't say something nice" people, but the workshop will not be helpful unless commentators are honest critics. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 1:56 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:32 pm
People v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:47 am
People v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:39 am
People who believe in immanence tend to see the Constitution as a collection of super-powerful principles capable of handling all subsequent constitutional change. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:55 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 6:31 am
People v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:23 am
People v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 2:11 am
Friedman dissented.I think it's kind of hot that the lone dissenter in this case is a female judge. [read post]
13 May 2008, 10:41 am
Michigan law prof Richard Friedman summarizes the Melendez-Diaz case, and gives links to the particulars: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 5:55 pm
""Some people get moral issues and legal issues confused," he said of the Commonwealth Court's ruling.Cheryl Lorraine Gaston, a lawyer for the city, could not be reached at press time. ..more.. by Zack Needles, The Legal IntelligencerSex Offender Research, Recidivism and the Truth [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:09 am
People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:29 am
People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:43 am
People v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 9:44 am
That means a government controlled by the people themselves. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:53 am
People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 7:43 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:28 am
People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 9:11 am
Procito v. [read post]
