Search for: "People v. Germany"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,215
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2014, 1:18 am
Noting the 'chilling effect' of the latter, the WGAW warn that the current legislation stifles innovation as people may be hesitant to start innovating businesses, fearing that copyright holders may come after them. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 4:03 pm
There was a criminal action in Germany under Germany's antiterrorism law - the guys ultimately apologized. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:06 am
Buck v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
The purpose is to show that this defendant was put in fear by these people. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:58 pm
(The Supreme Court won't necessarily follow it anyway, but it wouldn't have asked if it didn't care.)One can only speculate about the first question and make a more or less educated guess about the second point.Everybody who is interested in software IP issues knows that non-technical people face particular difficulties in figuring them out. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 12:11 am
There are many apps out there that have more than 100,000 users in a country like Germany (more than 80 million inhabitants), France, or Italy (the latter two each have more than 60 million people).If you have more than 100K people using your app in a given year (as the sum of first-time users who just downloaded and recurring users from previous years), the bill would (if passed) apply to you even if your revenues were minimal! [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:51 am
Kuehnen's panel handed down the ruling in that Unwired Planet v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Miller v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:14 pm
The parties to the Authors’ Guild et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm
The absence of judicial oversight does not contravene Art 8, as is evident from Uzun v Germany. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:15 am
In the three months since I started this Blog, it has been viewed by 3,446 people, including 404 from China, 57 from Germany, 40 from Italy, and hundreds of people from dozens of other countries. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 8:56 am
Hundreds of people were bused in from all over the country by DC-Cam and other organizations. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
Life After Hate, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 8:03 pm
Federal Republic of Germany, my post of the decision here. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications -- epilepsy,… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 4:03 pm
The decision in Sinnott illustrates that in Irish law, no less that in England (Theakston v MGN [2002] EWHC 137 (QB) (14 February 2002); Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457, [2004] UKHL 22 (6 May 2004)) and under the European Convention on Human Rights (Peck v UK 44647/98, (2003) 36 EHRR 719, [2003] ECHR 44 (28 January 2003); von Hannover v Germany 59320/00, (2005) 40 EHRR 1, [2004] ECHR 294 (24 June 2004)), it is no longer an answer (if it ever was) simply to… [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
Chocolate and Its King Charles V, King of Spain and Emperor of Germany, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing right As one of the most prominent encounters between the Spaniards and the native peoples of the Americas occurred in what is now Mexico, it is not unusual to see that many words that were added to the lexicon of Castile have their origins in Nahuatl and Mayan, the languages of the peoples of this region. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Case C-484/14 McFadden is a reference for a preliminary ruling from CJEU-loving Member State Germany, seeking clarification as regards the liability of a freely-accessible wi-fi provider for third-party copyright infringements committed via that wireless network. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
Germany: People have the right to claim compensation from internet service providers (ISPs) if internet access is disrupted, as the internet is now an “essential” part of life, a German court has ruled [Reuters / Jurist]. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:18 pm
Jacobson of Strasburger & Price, LLP, Washington, D.C. had, for example, a recent posting on "Heritage Foundation Hosts Program on Dual-Use Export Controls With China".Internet Cases points to an important case of first impression involving criminal harassment and MySpace (People v. [read post]
