Search for: "People v. Graves" Results 501 - 520 of 1,441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Here's Justice Gorsuch giving voice to that view earlier this year in his concurrence in West Virginia v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 6:33 pm
Brady, in Gideon, or striking down Plessy v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 11:51 am by ADR Times
Thus, the Supreme Court while relying on the findings of Voestalpine, TRF, and Perkins judgments in the Railway Electrification applied the mischief rule of interpretation which appears to be bewildering and a grave error of law.Conclusion In Bharat Aluminium Co v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 11:02 am by ADR Times
Thus, the Supreme Court while relying on the findings of Voestalpine, TRF, and Perkins judgments in the Railway Electrification applied the mischief rule of interpretation which appears to be bewildering and a grave error of law.ConclusionIn Bharat Aluminium Co v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm by Rick Hasen
However, we strongly dissent from the grave actions taken by the justices supporting the position in part III(A) of Justice MARY BETH KELLY’s opinion. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:52 am by nflatow
  Foreign plaintiffs have used the ATS to accuse corporations of committing grave human rights abuses, including genocide, war crimes, and forced labor. [read post]