Search for: "People v. Justice"
Results 501 - 520
of 25,658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
You can learn more about this from Justice Corrigan's opinion, but the easiest hypo is when you're trying to kill X and X is standing in a tight group of 10 people and you blast your Uzi into the group, killing not only X (who you wanted to kill) but also Y and Z. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:25 pm
But I don't think that, as Justice Ramirez says, that Ms. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
For people like me, whether that's okay or not probably won't have much of a practical effect at all; it's extremely unlikely to happen. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:58 am
Not Justice Kane. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 9:44 am
The dissenting opinion disagrees.None of the justices are particularly psyched about the practice. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 11:53 am
And, ummm, the sausage -- justice -- is so yummy.As long as you forget what's in it. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 2:35 pm
In lieu of granting leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 2:55 am
Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:01 pm
In which Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye provides the dispositive fourth vote. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:25 pm
Who needs me when you have Justice Gilbert, who write the following as the first two sentences of this opinion:"The new owner of a house prepares to move in. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
US Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas wrote a six-page concurring opinion for the Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari Monday in Seattle’s Union Gospel Mission v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
In Rumsfeld v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:16 pm
But we, “the people,” inspired by corrupt leaders, have not always been courageous, much less committed, enough to practice justice. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 1:58 pm
Yeah, the state can order people to wear masks. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 7:09 am
Seila Law v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm
Justice Thomas wants the Supreme Court to reconsider its holding in New York Times v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:27 am
Those of us who take the Fourth Amendment seriously, with its "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects" from search and seizure, were dismayed by the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Florence v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:35 am
“It is just repetitive, and it gets people mixed up,†Justice Stephen G. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 11:21 am
Earlier this year, in McDonald v. [read post]
