Search for: "People v. Juvenile Court" Results 501 - 520 of 1,142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
The juvenile court found that the tweets were clearly a threat. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Ken White
That's the same statute that was at issue in the Supreme Court's decision in Elonis v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> USA v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 2:55 am by Lyle Denniston
The current Supreme Court has a strong respect for the will of the people, and expressed that view rather emphatically in a decision last year (Schuette v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:13 pm
[Her lawyer] warned her that “juvenile courts are notorious for erring on the side of protecting the child” and suggested that fighting the case might lead her to lose her child. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:56 am by David M. Boertje
 It is the result of the famous 1996 Supreme Court case of Miranda v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
  New York’s Board of Education has got to be hoping the Court doesn’t do social promotion, because four repeats is usually enough for most people just to give in. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Bank of America v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:13 am by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court took up once again the question of whether its decision in Miller v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am by Maureen Johnston
Cox 14-531Issue: Whether this Court’s decision in Martinez v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:04 pm by Daniel Cappetta
As such, they will be prevented from making an in-court identification of the perpetrators at trial under Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Also, the Court has yet to set a Conference for the rescheduled Davis v. [read post]