Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 501 - 520
of 21,521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm
This has long been accepted practice, and this practice has continued to this day. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
What will happen to us, people? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Graham v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
Property v. property: TM v. domain names; land v. chattels; IP v. consumer goods. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 7:50 am
Governing people to people relations is a very different thing from state undermining personhood by criminalizing dancing. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Goodwill has a very long history as an intangible, proprietor-focused, use-based asset independent of TMs and related doctrines. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm
This is also the underlying constitutional question in the Supreme Court's Moore v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rees, Glossip v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am
Even though it’s not that long, the rule sure has a lot of legal terminology. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am
In the wake of last week’s pathbreaking International Court of Justice order of provisional measures concerning alleged genocide in Gaza, much reaction has rightly addressed the ramifications for international diplomacy, Israel, South Africa, the United States and the Palestinian people. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
In Johannessen v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
People talk of Chevron deference as though it were binary (deference or no deference), but in practice it is not so monolithic. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]