Search for: "People v. Orin" Results 501 - 520 of 580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2010, 11:59 am by Daniel Solove
The issue Orin raises involves the Fourth Amendment rights of the people Quon was texting and who texted Quon. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
”  Kerr analyzes the reply brief in one such case—City of Ontario v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 10:23 am by Eugene Volokh
As Article V of the Constitution says, the Amendments “shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 12:38 am by David Kopel
People are free to argue all they want, on the basis of aspiration, original meaning, or anything else, that items (a) through (d) on Orin’s list are unconstitutional. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by Eric Turkewitz
But Orin Kerr @ Volokh has also first-hand confirmed the appointment: How Did the White House Pick Its Law Blogger? [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:55 am by SHG
  I am not a big fan of the Herring decision.On the other hand, Arizona v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:05 am by SHG
  We are people, not merely the end of technological pipelines. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
Oral Argument in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:02 am by SHG
Over at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr posts about a decision, State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:15 am by Matt Sundquist
” Here, here, and here Orin Kerr and David Bernstein debate Glenn Beck’s comments on Roscoe Pound, a founder of “sociological jurisprudence. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:41 am by SHG
Why, if the Supremes were going to issue a one sentence per curiam opinion in Briscoe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 5:04 am by Howard Wasserman
This has triggered (for some) reminders of Bush v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm by Gideon
It can remind us to be better people, to engage in public service and to help others who are not as fortunate. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
" The New York Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]