Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 501 - 520
of 15,250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2010, 9:35 am
In Bowers v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:43 pm
Much of Perry v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:12 am
Jarkesy, and why I believe it’s a bigger deal than most people seem to think. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 4:47 pm
Congress defies this basic safeguard by vesting government power in a private entity not accountable to the people. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 11:55 am
Barnett The Wages of Stealth Overruling (With Particular Attention to Miranda v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 3:35 am
Paul Horwitz The leak of the draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:44 pm
This is incorrect.First, there is language in Chiafalo v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:15 pm
In the case, People v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
Thus, for instance, in Zacchini v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:35 am
Kali Borkoski: On June 26, the Court announced its decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
”PEOPLE V. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:55 am
The Eighth Circuit's case of United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
Allowing Subpoenas Used to Identify Defendants So far we have discussed people who want to call on the coercive power of the court system without having to name themselves as plaintiffs. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 5:25 pm
People die. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:49 am
Earlier coverage of Perry v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
Court of Appeal decision In R (Bancoult No 2) v Foreign Secretary [2007] EWCA Civ 498, the Court of Appeal held that the Immigration Order was an abuse of power because they permanently excluded an entire population from their homeland for reasons unrelated to the population’s wellbeing. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 8:45 pm
Although defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review, we exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see People v Fomby, 42 AD3d 894, 895; People v Valdez, 41 AD3d 1255, lv denied 9 NY3d 882).Last week, in People v Cambridge (2008 NY Slip Op 07435 [10/3/08]) the Court went a step further and corrected such an unpreserved error, in the interest of justice, depsite… [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:22 pm
Smith v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm
You can be liable for defaming an individual even if you do not name her.An interesting case is Leopold v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 5:16 am
Today, the billionaire is more powerful than ever. [read post]
