Search for: "People v. Render" Results 501 - 520 of 5,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2009, 3:09 pm
In People v Buccina (2009 NY Slip Op 03568 [4th Dept 5/1/09])the Appellate Division, Forth Department rejected the contention of defendant that he was denied his right to testify before the grand jury where defendant refused to testify before the grand jury after he was informed that, pursuant to the policy of the jail where he was confined, he would not be allowed to change into street clothes before being transported to the grand jury. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:02 pm
  These omissions rendered the disclosures made materially false and misleading. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 2:45 pm
Perhaps the same people are giving legal advice to both of them. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:55 am by Brian Shiffrin
For example, the Court in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]), considered how Crawford applies two categories of evidence: DNA reports and , fingerprints, comparisons. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:07 am by Kristina Araya
In People v Kilpatrick, defendant Kwame Kilpatrick challenged the constitutionality of the Michigan statute that allowed the trial court to enter an order requiring that all proceeds from the sale of his book be placed in escrow to pay restitution to the city of Detroit. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 7:12 am by James Eckert
A verdict is repugnant if an acquittal on one charge conclusively negates a necessary element of a crime for which the defendant was convicted (People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1 [1981]). [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Michael Kagan
That holding has been hotly debated, but it rendered the special solicitude question irrelevant in the main student loan case. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm by randal shaheen
Just because a ZIP code is shared by many individuals does not render it “dissimilar” to a street address, which also is often shared by multiple people. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]