Search for: "People v. Sample"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,945
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2019, 2:33 pm
Why can't lay people figure out a patent's quality or value? [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:06 pm
Mithun Mansinghani serves as solicitor general for the state of Oklahoma, which filed an amicus brief joined by 16 other states in support of the petitioners in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:00 pm
Related Cases: Center for Genetics and Society v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 8:47 am
One reason that it cost so little is that it is working for purpose–it is not intended to catch everything, it is only intended to catch works by the people who sign YouTube’s chump deal or people who are “important” (in the best traditions of YouTube’s founders). [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
” In 1972, in Apodaca v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm
The PA sent blood and urine samples to the lab, which returned results showing an elevated white blood cell count of 15.4.[1] CT scan – mild acute colitis At 11:50 PM, radiologist Raul Galvez-Trevino, MD performed a contrast-enhanced CT scan of Lawrence’s abdomen and pelvis, during which he identified mild acute colitis involving the ascending and transverse colon, suspicious for either an infectious or inflammatory etiology. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 11:26 am
Here's a sample of this argument: In contrast [to platforms that allow people to whatever they want], here [Twitter] has virtually created an editorial staff ... who ... spend time censoring [user posts]. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 11:26 am
Here's a sample of this argument: In contrast [to platforms that allow people to whatever they want], here [Twitter] has virtually created an editorial staff ... who ... spend time censoring [user posts]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
In September 2018, the New Jersey Appellate Division ruled in State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:37 am
” We were not able to DM 28 people (34 percent of our sample); we followed them temporarily — which made for two days of dreadful Twitter — but they never followed us back. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
One rule created by the Chun decision requires women who are over sixty years of age to provide a smaller breath sample than other people, based on findings that women at that age are generally unable to provide as much breath as their male peers. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 8:40 am
Hodges, Burwell v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:08 am
Circuit precedent—specifically People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v USDA (PETA) and Action Alliance of Senior Citizens of Greater Philadelphia v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
sample tweets. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
The Law Students Society of Ontario (the “LSSO”) recently surveyed Ontario law students to better understand the debt load experienced by them and its effect on them. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:05 pm
At the time of this investigation there were people living in recreational vehicles on undeveloped land within one mile of the hose pump. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:32 pm
At the time of this investigation there were people living in recreational vehicles on undeveloped land within one mile of the hose pump. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
Entry to inspect was allowed, but soil sampling had not been provided in the 1980 legislation. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:17 am
Aero Rubber Co. v. [read post]
