Search for: "People v. Sharp"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
As already mentioned, on 6 July 2012, Sharp J gave the long awaited judgment in El-Naschie v Macmillan, ([2012] EWHC1809 (QB)) heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:21 am
But faced with the choice, I clearly prefer Android because Apple is too heavy-handed.The Epic Games v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:27 am
This program is limited to 15 people. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:54 am
Haslip, TXO Production Corp. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:53 pm
I was recently reading a decision from a federal appeals court in a case called Sterngold Dental, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:06 am
“Expect a shock,” said Michael V. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:53 pm
I was recently reading a decision from a federal appeals court in a case called Sterngold Dental, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
Hysteria broke out across the Europhobic tabloid press with the judges being dubbed “the enemies of the people”. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
That is only one of many discoveries his fresh eyes and sharp mind spotted. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm
In People v. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm
In People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 5:08 pm
In last week's Widdison v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 7:58 am
A recent case, Deschamps v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Many suspect that insanity and other excuses based on mental or emotional disorders allow bad people to get away with misconduct. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
Would any academic (who is reasonably sane) want to go into a situation where hatred of a person, as oppose to "sharp disagreement" with their views, is the order of the day? [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:04 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Bowker v Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, heard 21 October 2010 (Sharp J). [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
Justice Sharpe refers to La Forest J. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
(I should note that there is some sharp criticism of Ms M’s pleaded defence insofar as it addresses the history of interactions with the Council, and the state of Ms M’s mental health. [read post]
