Search for: "People v. Stephens" Results 501 - 520 of 2,661
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:36 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
Steve Vladeck analyzed the dissent in Doe v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer in his recent powerful dissent in Glossip v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
He cited specific black people who had criticized King. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Ted Frank
As Ilya pointed out in 2007, "Most people - even most constitutional lawyers - think of federalism as a system of limitations on central government power. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 6:48 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Language scientists have made great strides in the past quarter-Century, but legal professionals are only now waking-up to the importance of this language tool.In People v Harris, Justices Zahra and Stephen Markman both used corpus linguistics in opposing opinions to address a legal question involving whether a police officer's false statement is nevertheless protected within the scope of a Michigan law that procribes a police officer’s involuntary… [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:31 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Thus, I don't care if a nominee is a liberal or a conservative, or whether he or she supports Roe v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
The clause was created in reference to a real Civil War in which over 750,000 people died in combat. [read post]