Search for: "People v. Sullivan" Results 501 - 520 of 1,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2015, 5:42 am
For an interesting recent case dealing with this question, see AFDI v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Douglas Smith looks at Evenwel v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Sullivan, state tort law of defamation has been limited by federal constitutional principles. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm by Mark Graber
 The below will hopefully give people some sense of the contents and contributors.Efforts to provide comprehensive guides to the United States Constitution date from the framing and ratification of the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
When Judge Sullivan discovered that the prosecutors in the Stevens case had obtained their conviction after failing to disclose exculpatory evidence, he appointed a special counsel, DC attorney Henry Schuelke III, to independently investigate the prosecutors’ conduct. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm by Jack Sharman
  Counsel should therefore remember that he or she is dealing with individual people rather than the institution of “Congress. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Michael Chiaramonte (2L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Hanna Shoshany (3L), Victoria Wagnerman (2L) The competition involved a criminal case of People v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:02 pm
Sullivan (1964) (rejecting the view that libel is categorically unprotected, and holding that the libel exception requires a showing that the libelous accusations be “of and concerning” a particular person); Garrison v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:47 am by Floyd Abrams
Sullivan and then, ten years later, in Legal Services v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 8:15 am by SHG
Sullivan at the SLAPP stage, anyhow. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  There’s mere wordplay to say that photos are transformed from documentation of wedding to confirmation of text saying people are married.Then there’s White v. [read post]