Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Wells)" Results 501 - 520 of 1,870
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Rejected by the overwhelming majority of courts nationwide, as well as by the Third Restatement of Torts;2. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:50 am by Evan M. Levow
The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court issued a ruling several months ago in State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 10:07 am by Michael Grossman
Despite these defenses, the facility recently filed a notice of settlement with the Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm by Mark Ashton
The Superior Court denied the request but ordered the trial court to review the matter. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., RPI) (5th Dist.10/30/12) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ 2012 WL 5350450, the Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate directing the Superior Court to overrule a demurrer it had sustained without leave to two causes of action of a CEQA writ petition.  [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
The Court of Appeals disagreed, finding that the witness was “a qualified expert in the field of forensics and an employee at the North Carolina State Crime Lab, [who] testified to her qualifications in the area of DNA analysis as well as her training and experience in gathering evidence for DNA profiles. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
As a peacemaker the lawyer has a superior opportunity of being a good man. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:40 am
Feliciano, 2014 WL 1577768 (Superior Court of New Jersey – Appellate Division 2014). [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
This post examines a recent decision of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania: Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 6:03 am by Adil Ahmad Haque
The legal rationale for such an order would be that further attacks, as well as the continued captivity of hostages, would tend to “aggravate or extend the dispute before the Court or make it more difficult to resolve” and therefore fall within the scope of the Court’s power to indicate provisio [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:10 am by Eric S. Solotoff
  The bill was a knee jerk reaction by the legislature who were unhappy with a number of more recent court decisions liberally allowing for palimony claims including the ruling in Devaney v. [read post]