Search for: "People v. Wells"
Results 501 - 520
of 26,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2017, 2:02 pm
Which is a definite no-no, as well as contrary to the judge's instructions.Now, in my mind, Solorio isn't looking all that great at the retrial either. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:36 am
Both as regards the fact that the prosecutor erred as well as to the fact that the error was harmless.I'll just add one thought. [read post]
14 May 2014, 10:49 am
As well as an implicit threat.When the lender refused to give the Acostas the demanded ten thousand dollars to "maybe" vacate the premises, they deliberately destroyed the property. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:55 pm
There's a whole lot of other stuff to put aside as well; feel free to read the whole opinion if you'd like.Here's the issue:Defendant's convicted under Section 288.3(a) of the Penal Code, which makes it a crime to contact a minor for the purpose of committing various crimes; in particular, here, the crime of sexual penetration of a minor. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 11:50 am
And Johnson -- the shot-caller, who wasn't even present at the raid -- gets convicted of first-degree murder as well, and sentenced to 26 years to life.The Court of Appeal affirms.Tough luck for both Johnson and Baker-Riley. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 12:33 pm
The lesson shouldn't exactly fade.Also, later in the opinion, when I learned that the now-somewhat-elderly defendant was picked up riding a motorcycle, I thought: "Well, at least he's riding a motorcycle instead of driving a car; that way, he's less likely to kill someone this time, and most likely just ends up killing himself. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 11:25 am
For the jury as well as for the Court of Appeal. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 12:35 pm
But I'm perfectly happy for them to apply it as well. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:15 am
That "take the money but not my wallet" strategy definitely did not work out very well. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 1:58 pm
And if my lawyer disagreed with that call, well, that's fine, but then I'd just as soon represent myself, thank you very much.There's got to at least be some leeway there, right? [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:37 pm
(I'm not actually sure of her exact age; the opinion merely refers to her "advanced age and poor health" and the fact that she's receiving social security and well as retirement benefits. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 4:08 pm
Naifs wh are still trying to get their mind round the idea of bank as a place where people frantically buy and sell stuff might do well to see if they can scare up a copy of Ken Auletta's Greed and Glory on Wall Street: The Fall of the House of Lehman (1986) in which he chronicles the titanic face-off between Pete Peterson --the "banker"--and Lew Glucksman--the "trader". [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm
Nixon v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:46 am
Well, armed with these jury instructions, they did what most people seem to do when faced with the dark art of calculating patent infringement damages: they stuck their nine figures in the air, filled out a form, and came up with a number... [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:14 pm
The Ninth Circuit recently decided Barnes v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Recognizing that some people might be more vulnerable to community stigma because of their religious community membership could well be praised as the governmental "neutrality in the face of religious differences" that Sherbert v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 7:55 am
The court wrote that if the parties responsible for parking lot maintenance may have had a duty to anticipate harm in that footpath because, as the well-worn area suggests, people had been using it as a walkway for some time. [read post]
22 May 2016, 7:55 am
The court wrote that if the parties responsible for parking lot maintenance may have had a duty to anticipate harm in that footpath because, as the well-worn area suggests, people had been using it as a walkway for some time. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm
Epton; People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
”Obergefell v. [read post]
