Search for: "People v. White" Results 501 - 520 of 7,169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2017, 5:33 pm
 Meanwhile, big loss for immigration people in Jules v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:19 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The candidate suffered from “White Coats Syndrome” which is an elevated blood pressure in a clinical setting. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:37 pm by Anthony Gaughan
It is also noteworthy that he joined the Court in 1988, exactly 30 years ago, the kind of round number people often like for bringing careers to a close. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:00 pm by admin
Are “fat” people covered under the ADA? [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am by Will Baude
On one hand, if one really believes that discrimination against white people and discrimination against non-white people are constitutionally indistinguishable, then such motivations seem constitutionally suspects. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:51 am by David Bernstein
The civil rights group challenging the segregation law in Plessy v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:11 am by Nate Persily
As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence? [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:45 am
But if it is simply a racist website designed to frighten people, it is not a true threat.One possible argument for the website being a true threat would be to analogize it to a burning cross, as in Virginia v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:01 pm by sgottlieb
The world that so many of us, Black and white for different reasons, have learned to fear, is a post-Terry v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It has sprung instead from the dominant fears of white political leaders in the South, ardent segregationists and white supremacists who wanted to minimize the impact of black voting and political influence. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:37 pm
This morning, the Supreme Court deadlocked on the decision in Texas v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:30 pm
It clearly is segregation, whether you want to defend it or attack it.Campus officials said the decision to hold separate meetings Monday for white and minority students, faculty and staff was made to ensure people of color had a place to discuss their concerns, and said the rules were not meant to exclude participants. [read post]