Search for: "People v. Wright" Results 501 - 520 of 755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
What the original draftsmen (that is, the people who actually wrote the words) subjectively intended might be evidence of what the words meant at the time, but any divergence between the drafters’ subjective intentions and the most likely understandings of those words at the time of enactment would be resolved in favor of the latter. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
James Cannell argued that under the test established in Boumediene v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am by Eric
July 17, 2012) [Eric's Note: Sam Bayard is an associate at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP in New York. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 3:22 am by Lisa Stam
  Context Does Matter People often describe online comments as having the same exposure as an employee shouting out comments in the hallways of the workplace. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 10:39 am by P.J. Blount
Wright, Grego & Gronlund, THE PHYSICS OF SPACE SECURITY 33-34 (Cambridge, American Acadamy of Arts and Sciences 2005) 4 Katz v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy  -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:45 am by Stephen Jenei
  The Bad: Too many people selling, not enough people buying. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 2:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
the court has no discretion; concurrent sentences are mandated' " (People v Roundtree, 75 AD3d 1136, 1138, lv denied 15 NY3d 855, quoting People v Hamilton, 4 NY3d 654, 658; see People v Cromwell, 71 AD3d 414, 415, lv denied 15 NY3d 803; People v Mercer, 66 AD3d 1368, 1370, lv denied 13 NY3d 940). [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:44 pm
Well, the courts appreciate that this could happen and the Court of Criminal Appeals held in Wright v. [read post]