Search for: "Persons v. Jones" Results 501 - 520 of 3,881
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2017, 11:34 am by Giles Peaker
A DWP Decision Maker interviewing a young person. [read post]
25 Dec 2019, 8:32 pm by Jon Katz
Curiously, while Virginia's Supreme Court says that refusal to conduct field sobriety testing is not consciousness of guilt, such refusal can still be considered by the judge in determining whether probable cause existed to arrest the defendant for DUI, Jones v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 4:50 pm by David Fraser
This case stands for the proposition that the existence of the statutory invasion of privacy law does not preclude the existence of the common law "intrusion upon seclusion" tort as described in Jones v Tsige. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Jessica Jones, Matrix Chambers
Giving the majority judgment, Lord Lloyd-Jones held that TRA was capable of being “a person acting in an official capacity”. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:14 am by Chris Seaton
Note: Following the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decision in Jones v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 11:47 am by Native American Rights Fund
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2015-2016update.htmlPetition for certiorari was filed on 7/13/16 in Jones v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:04 am
Jones, appellant Subscription Required APPELLATE DIVISIONSECOND DEPARTMENTLegal Profession Personal Service Bid Not ‘Due Diligence'; ‘Nail and Mail' Service Did Not Confer Jurisdiction in Malpractice Suit NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice Court, Former Attorney Did Not Provide Incorrect Advice on Immigration Status; Vacatur… [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:11 pm by Rekha Arulanantham, ACLU
Which search engine forces you to share your personal data with almost all of its products and sites? [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am by CMS
In this post, Tim Sales, a partner in the Dispute Resolution team at CMS, and Hannah Jones, who works in the Tax team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Tinkler v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2021] UKSC 39, which concerned whether estoppel by convention applied to prevent the taxpayer disputing that HMRC had validly served a notice of enquiry. [read post]