Search for: "Petition of State" Results 501 - 520 of 52,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2010, 6:10 am by Kiran Bhat
The petition of the day is: Title: Idaho v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 7:19 pm by Mary Dwyer
The petition of the day is: Crawley v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 6:45 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Jackson v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:07 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: U.S. [read post]
12 May 2015, 7:35 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Salahuddin v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:10 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Hildebrand v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:12 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Umana v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Hildebrand v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:16 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Massi v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:12 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Luis v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: The Rawlings Company, LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 pm by Mary Dwyer
The petition of the day is: Director of the Department of Revenue of Montana v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:42 am by Aurora Barnes
The petitions of the week are: Moya v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 12:24 pm by Aurora Barnes
Nutley 18-301 Issue: Whether common-fund fee awards are governed in diversity cases by state or federal law. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 11:30 am by Aurora Barnes
The petitions of the week are: Thomas v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 10:35 am by Aurora Barnes
The post Petitions of the week appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
3 May 2016, 8:56 am by Mayberry Law Firm
For all intents and purposes the State Attorney’s Office will treat petit theft in the same fashion regardless of its misdemeanor level. [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
Kindler Issue:   Is a state procedural rule automatically “inadequate” under the adequate-state-grounds doctrine - and therefore unenforceable on federal habeas corpus review - because the state rule is discretionary rather than mandatory? [read post]