Search for: "Points v. Points" Results 501 - 520 of 90,897
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am by Dave
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am by Dave
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 12:37 am
“The” way vs “a” way (Japan v China dept) and James Fallows Turns On His Television Set James Fallows putes together an   interesting of how things are done in Japan vs. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:25 am by Jeff Gamso
There's lots of argument around the margins, but nobody much disputes the basic point. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:56 am by Joe Tort
I want to point out that Richard Epstein just posted a nice column on Comcast v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 6:26 am by Mark Tushnet
I finally got around to reading Graham v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 2:06 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Raises a number of points in connection with the law of private nuisance. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am by David Smith
The Court of Appeal had already refused permission to appeal on this point some time ago in the case of Elias v Spencer (no relation!). [read post]