Search for: "Poland v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 713
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
The judgment of Nicol J in the case of Euroeco Fuels (Poland) Ltd & Ors v Szczecin And Swinoujscie Seaports Authority SA & Ors [2018] EWHC 1081 (QB). [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:54 am
So far he only has a little list, relating to the patents for (i) Escitalopram, (ii) Lipitor, (iii) Viagra and (iv) Olanzapine, plus Conor Medsystems v Angiotech. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 8:37 am
The GC further stated that trademarks in the field of pet care products and food (classes 5 and 31) would normally be perceived visually, as the products are purchased from shelves. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 6:21 pm
= = = = = 1 Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón in International Stem Cell Corporation, delivered on 17 July 2014, C-364/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2104 (here) 2 Judgment in Brüstle v Greenpeace eV, C-34/10, EU:C:2011:669 (here) [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 4:10 am
The jurisprudence section of this issue includes the CJEU judgments, 15.7.2021, European Commission v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
The Omnipresent State Sector 552 2. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 7:46 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
– ZAO Gruppa Predpriyatij Ost v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:42 pm
Yes, it can be done: Siemens AG v Seagate Technology (Ireland) (PatLit) Poland Court of Conciliation for Internet Domains dismisses complaint brought by Bisazza S.p. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Technogenia v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Both Germany and the United States have advocated the “hybrid” route, with U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Otten (EPLAW) Non-infringement case: Safeway v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Khan v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Roof Security (EPLAW) Miffy miffed by Cathy – Kitty the kopy kat’s friend (IP Factor) Norway Topshop trouble in Norway (Class 46) Poland GUCCI v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
Entertainment, et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Antonious v. [read post]
