Search for: "Poling v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2009, 7:24 pm
  Adopting the Illinois Supreme Court's reasoning in 2314 Lincoln Park West Condominium Association v. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 2:48 pm by Michael Lowe
” For Texas practitioners comes the guidance of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in application of the USSG, quoting the comic opera in US v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:23 am
Now he's asking if states can define what constitutes death. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
They believe it makes the product less safe and less nutritious and wouldn’t touch it with a 10-foot pole. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
Here is what I say about this precise topic in Chapter 4 of my new book, in my discussion of the landmark Warren Court opinion of New York Times v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 8:38 am
The precedent is United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 3:48 pm by Lawrence Solum
Rules themselves vary--let's use hard and soft to refer to the poles of a continuum. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
Rules themselves vary--let's use hard and soft to refer to the poles of a continuum. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by Lawrence Solum
Rules themselves vary--let's use hard and soft to refer to the poles of a continuum. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Shusta, the court stated that even participants in an informal “kick the can” game owed no additional duty to each other than to refrain from intentional or willful and wanton misconduct. [19]             Some courts have broadened the scope of liability for sports participants by imposing a duty of care for unforeseeable risks which players would clearly not endorse… [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In past downturns, we haven’t seen ads like this (v. something staplegunned to a telephone pole). [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
Judges were participants in the tradition and had to abide by its rules – both stated and unstated. [read post]