Search for: "Polisher v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2017, 11:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Gogo and says it has been cited favorably by federal and state trial courts. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Amy Howe
Supreme Court and law clerks who worked for the justices were less polished than they are now. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:23 am
These entities and individuals acquired either rough or cut-and-polished gem diamonds but did not do so directly from De Beers or its competitors. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
Facts Ms Zalewska, a Polish national, went to Northern Ireland to look for work on 1 July 2004. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Poland The Jewish Chronicle had a piece “Polish court libel verdict condemned by Holocaust scholars”. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]
26 May 2007, 4:23 pm
In both cases, the state creates a monopoly right over something otherwise available to the masses (especially as the business asset with trade marks is protectable by passing off, so the registration system is a state-awarded bonus created by impinging on public freedom). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:39 pm by Quinta Jurecic
” Stoltenberg reiterated his reminder that NATO’s Article V clause committing members to collective defense has only been invoked once, in response to the 9/11 attacks. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:43 am by PJ Blount
Godz. 11.00 Coffee break Godz. 11.30 V session ? [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 5:03 am by admin
In Peugh v United States, SCOTUS ruled federal criminal defendants must be sentenced under the guidelines in effect when the crime took place, not higher guidelines in place when the defendant is sentenced. [read post]