Search for: "Powers v. Taylor" Results 501 - 520 of 872
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Supreme Court resolved this landmark case in 1964, New York Times v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Taylor, 1955 CanLII 145 (ON CA), [1955] O.R. 131 (C.A.), at p. 142: He is not an extraordinary or unusual creature; he is not superhuman; he is not required to display the highest skill of which anyone is capable; he is not a genius who can perform uncommon feats, nor is he possessed of unusual powers of foresight. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm by Giles Peaker
These were questions in Lawal & Anor v Circle 33 Housing Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 1514. [read post]
Authors: Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Dylan Sault and Steven Li  Welcome to our first wrap up of the year! [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am by Erin Miller
  At the Atlantic, Stuart Taylor explains why he thinks Kagan should stonewall the Senate. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
Bell (07-1114) — involving federal habeas courts’ power to review certain claims made in state court. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
Indiana, 14-631 and Taylor v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
Orin Kerr flagged two draft chapters he wrote on implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
An attempt by Ms F to argue that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) L.R. 1 Exch. 265 applied giving rise to a strict liability on CHA was quickly dealt withThe use in question must therefore be extraordinary and unusual in contrast to, [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
An attempt by Ms F to argue that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) L.R. 1 Exch. 265 applied giving rise to a strict liability on CHA was quickly dealt withThe use in question must therefore be extraordinary and unusual in contrast to, [read post]