Search for: "President Judge Determination Cases" Results 501 - 520 of 9,284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Alison Siegler
" This sentiment was echoed in a Detention Hearing we observed, in which the presiding judge remarked: "Candidly, I don't know whether the presumption is rebutted or not. [read post]
Also on the same day, a federal judge sought further appellate review of the Michael Flynn criminal case in which Trump appears to have intervened to let an ally off the hook. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 8:05 am by Frank Pasquale
After all, as Professor Judith Resnik observes, because the panel’s decision to grant the stay “left the district court with nothing to do” while the appeal is pending, there was no urgency for the panel to determine right away who would preside over the case upon remand. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:24 am
 The success of the UPC will be determined by the quality of its decisions and, thus, the experience of its judges. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:54 am by Dennis Crouch
In general, Section 337 investigations are conducted by administrative law judges (ALJs) who are employed by the USITC to determine various issues. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 9:14 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The court of inquiry statute requires the judge calling for the court to refer the matter to the presiding judge for assignment. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:26 am by Doug Cornelius
  The problem is that the administrative law judges were appointed by an internal panel instead of by the President or the SEC Commissioners. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 11:01 am
After a child is identified as a witness comes the question of whether the judge, hearing officer or special commissioner presiding over a domestic violence case will allow a child witness to testify. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday, Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who is presiding over multiple consolidated Google Play Store antitrust cases (brought by Epic Games, three dozen state AGs, Match Group, and class-action plaintiffs), entered his findings of fact and conclusions of law, ordering monetary sanctions first (recovery of attorneys' fees) and announcing that non-monetary sanctions will be determined a little… [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 6:07 am by NBlack
This determination was later reaffirmed by the Committee in Opinion 2010-06. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 7:08 am by pfriedman
But, as he makes clear, pointing out that determining, for example, whether a given governmental action satisfies the requirement of “due process” “hardly scratches the surface” of constitutional judging. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:22 pm by velvel
In those days, when Kennedy was still President, we pretty much thought that the Department did high level work, and it was also thought that the SEC was a premier, a very high quality, government agency. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
Bennett explained to me: “Which of these two views of authority prevails will, I think, determine how the case turns out. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Any judge that inexperienced or incompetent has no business presiding over anything more significant than small claims court. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 11:44 am by Mass Injury Group
The plaintiff appealed, arguing that the judge presiding over the first damages trial erred by allowing a motion for a new trial and remitting the jury’s verdict from $600,000 to $70,000. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:11 am by Amanda Frost
Should judges rely on a president’s public pronouncements to resolve cases? [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:11 pm
The charges stem from the judge's conduct in two separate cases. [read post]