Search for: "Price v. International Paper"
Results 501 - 520
of 638
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2010, 10:37 am
Viacom has three high-priced Biglaw firms on the brief: Jenner & Block, Shearman & Sterling, and former Solicitor General Ted Olsen of Gibson Dunn. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
This can be a heavy burden, particularly where the charge is a grave one, but requiring defendants to prove truth is not incompatible with Article 10: see McVicar v UK (2002) 35 EHRR 22; Steel v UK [2005] EMLR 314. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
Dan Burk has a paper on this. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:47 am
The few companies that own the patents in GURTs would set non-competitive market prices. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
This is Part 2 of a paper given to the City University Forum on “Re-Framing Libel” on 4 November 2010. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 10:20 am
Yale hosted CELS V, and the committee did a bang up job: the food was tasty; there were no technical snafus of note; and the panels appeared to have a high degree of internal validity & congruence. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:12 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.November 4, 2010 - 2 PM: Zao Gruppa Predpriyatij Ost and Zao Ost Aqua v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:17 pm
Stock Price Evidence from FTC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:17 am
NOVEMBER InfoSecurity – Netherlands November 3-4, 2010 Utrecht, Netherlands Click here for more information. 55th Annual ARMA International Conference and Expo November 07-10, 2010 San Francisco, CA Click here for more information. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:30 am
sub=AR), the paper describes the cozy and questionable relationship between an ANC, Eyak Corp., and V [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:05 am
Cir. 1997); AND The individual infringing and non-infringing components must be sold together so that they constitute a functional unit or are parts of a complete machine or single assembly of parts, Paper Converting Machine Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm
It calls this “mediation”, which consists of bullying or otherwise cajoling hapless complainants into accepting the minimum grudging redress the paper can get away with. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 9:19 pm
MISAT (6) , Owusu v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:04 am
At the current market price, the investors in those deals would be showing paper gains of roughly $18 million. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 7:30 am
The workforce dragged their now-tanned heels back to their paper-covered desks and the AmeriKat happily started her first week at her new law firm. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am
Because copyright owners seek to obtain higher fees; price discriminate. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am
Paper looks at tangible v. intangible property rights, and the customization we engage in when we tinker with something we own—the communicative value of a pair of jeans and how people change them/wear them. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:02 pm
Last week, CIT Chief Judge Jane Restani issued an important decision (PDF) in the case of GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
