Search for: "Price v. United States"
Results 501 - 520
of 5,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm
United States, 536 U.S. 545 and applying Apprendi v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:37 am
For example, it published that the United States national average interest rate for five-year certificates of deposit as of December 21, 2005 was 3.95%. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:16 pm
Behrend et al., the United States Supreme Court reversed the Third Circuit’s decision to certify a class of Comcast subscribers allegedly harmed due to practices of Comcast in the Philadelphia “cluster” that supposedly lessened competition and resulted in supra-competitive prices. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
The Commerce Department has great flexibility to select surrogate values and find that government prices or domestic costs are below market values or world market prices. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
In AnchorBank, FSB v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
In dismissing a complaint for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), the Court of Chancery in Monroe County Employees’ Retirement Sys. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:12 am
The Supreme Court of the United States on Tuesday issued its opinion in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:22 pm
Price, 361 U.S. 304, 31 3 (1960 ) United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:58 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted that motion, holding that plaintiffs had not alleged falsity or materiality. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:09 am
Facciponti works for the taxpayers of the United States of America. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 9:08 am
Price, et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – June 13th, 2019) involves an automobile accident between the plaintiff and the defendant. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 9:48 am
Davis, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Civil Action No. 4:07-cv-00379 (E.D. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:58 am
The 5-4 majority held that the district court and Ninth Circuit both erred in concluding that the price-squeezees stated a viable antitrust claim. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 9:00 am
Halliburton Co. will head back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, with perhaps another trip to the Supreme Court to follow. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
In a similar vein, we are thankful for the helpful briefing and argument we received from the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri granted in part and denied in part defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 6:57 am
State v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:33 pm
United States, No. 12-597C (Feb. 14, 2013). [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 9:04 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
The U.S. purchasers alleged that the Chinese sellers had agreed to fix the price and quantity of vitamin C exported to the United States from China, in violation of §1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U. [read post]
