Search for: "Queen v. Queen" Results 501 - 520 of 4,482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
 Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 12:05 pm by Daily Record Staff
Adcock’s battle to get his condominium association, Queen’s Landing Council of Unit Owners, Inc., appellee, to approve his requests for permission to construct dormers on the roof of his residence. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 1:29 am by Magdaleen Jooste
Neil Wilkof considered the story of “The Queen’s Gambit”. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 4:39 am by CMS
  What is particularly touching is his wish that she could have been alive for his knighthood and to share in the story of his audience with Her Majesty The Queen in 1993. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
In a landmark joint judgment of the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Dame Victoria Sharp, and Mr Justice Swift, overturned findings that Mr Beckwith had breached Principles 2 and 6 of the SRA Principles and reversed his fine and quashed the costs order (Beckwith v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2020] EWHC 3231 (Admin)). [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 2:43 pm
In Hetherington v Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Authority, 2020 SKQB 110, the Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan considered the impact of an employee’s voluntary interruption of employment on her entitlement to common law reasonable notice following her wrongful dismissal without cause. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
In that case, R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister, [2019] UKSC 41, on judicial review the UK Supreme Court held that the prorogation had been unlawful. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Scott Spencer made the allegations in an eight-page statement of claim against law firm Robertson Stromberg filed at Court of Queen’s Bench in Saskatoon. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 3:22 am by John Hochfelder
Defendants appealed arguing that the award was excessive; however, in Arcos v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 3:11 am by Apostolos Anthimos
’ (Andrea Saccucci, University of Campania);   ‘The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in the Development of Rules on Universal Civil Jurisdiction – Naït-Liman v Switzerland in the Transition between the Chamber and the Grand Chamber’ (Serena Forlati, University of Ferrara);   ‘The Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights – Lessons from the Naït-Liman Case’ (Malgosia Fitzmaurice, Queen Mary… [read post]
Senator Dianne Feinstein followed a similar line, asking whether Barrett believed Roe v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 8:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Crucial in the Queen’s Bench decision was that the judge improperly applied even the old test of standard of review, focusing exclusively on the outcome in a Dunsmuir analysis, rather than the entire process. [read post]